Best practices for submitting tree-wide changes
In some cases, the same change should be made to many parts of the codebase. This includes things like adding set -o pipefail to shell scripts or moving command substitutions to their own commands. Should one send a single patch that makes all the changes, or should one send a bunch of tiny patches? Preferably, the answer should be added to the documentation so people don't need to ask again :) -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com> writes:
In some cases, the same change should be made to many parts of the codebase. This includes things like adding set -o pipefail to shell scripts or moving command substitutions to their own commands. Should one send a single patch that makes all the changes, or should one send a bunch of tiny patches?
Preferably, the answer should be added to the documentation so people don't need to ask again :)
A single patch with no component prefix in the subject line is fine. Documentation doesn't currently have a good place for this sort of thing but I'll note the request for when we restructure it next year.
participants (2)
-
Alyssa Ross -
Demi Marie Obenour