Valentin Gagarin <valentin@gagarin.work> writes:
We should pick (and document) a preferred order!
Agreed and noted for later.
.main-content { // Just the Docs puts titles next to definitions, rather than on @@ -20,3 +21,23 @@ margin-left: 2ch; } } + +// Make the logo and title fit the site header. +.site-header { + .site-logo { + width: 3rem; + } + + // Just the Docs displays a sidebar at the "medium size" `md` breakpoint and above. + // Use the upstream `mq` media query mixin to target that breakpoint. + // https://just-the-docs.com/docs/utilities/responsive-modifiers/ + // https://github.com/just-the-docs/just-the-docs/blob/v0.10.1/_sass/support/mi... + @include mq(md) { + .site-logo { + width: 5.5rem; + }
Is there a reason for this number, rather than just setting it back to 100%? Yes, because 100% means different things for different screen sizes. The media queries seem to be used inconsistently upstream; different elements shift at different breakpoints... That may or may not be fixed by bumping the dependency, but that currently is precluded by build failures. Keeping the font size and logo size fixed doesn't produce surprises.
I recommend not to put too much energy into this in any case. Aligning the output style across the current website and "the docs" will likely make this obsolete one way or another eventually.
Alright, patch queued. Thank you!